Need To Speak To A Lawyer?
Need a lawyer?
Yes No

Results
Matter

NASHVILLE CRIMINAL LAWYERS | CASE STUDIES

Home » Case Studies » Order of Protection Hearing | Stalking

Order of Protection Hearing | Stalking

Practice Area : Order of Protection
Order of protection case study of a client accused of stalking his ex-girlfriend via texts, accessing her email, and other online accounts.

CASE BRIEF:

Order of protection case study of a client accused of stalking his ex-girlfriend via texts, accessing her email, and other online accounts.

THE STAKES:

Our client had zero criminal history and was a high-profile individual. The potential damage to his name and reputation was our client’s primary concern. The Petitioner was a former business partner and ex-girlfriend. If granted, our client would have been publicly humiliated as well as unable to perform any duties in the company he helped create and thus unable to exercise his shares in said company.

Our client would have also been ostracized from the community he helped create as a result of creating that company. Furthermore, the risks for anyone under an Order of Protection, and particularly for someone like our client, are:

  • The allegations against you will be public, and
  • You are subject to immediate arrested, without a warrant, if the person simply alleges you violated the order of protection.

For our client, these were unacceptable risks because the Petitioner was a former business partner and they remained in the same industry, which our client was passionate about.  

THE GOAL(S):

To protect our client’s public profile and safeguard him from unnecessary risk, our goal was to have the Order of Protection dismissed and, if possible, expunged. 

THE PLAN:

The complicated nature of the technical evidence presented against my client, and our inability to gain access to the specific files and electronic logs, made this a difficult case to prove within the narrow window of time before the Order of Protection hearing. The plan was to comb through our client’s accounts and every possible way his accounts might be associated with the accuser’s accounts in order to explain why they might indicate our client accessed them and/or how someone could make it look like our client attempted to access them.  

After interviewing our client at length and combing through his email accounts, social profiles, and internet browser history, passwords, and settings, it became clear that the Petitioner’s accounts that our client was accused of “hacking” were most likely connected to our client’s accounts because of the business they owned together. We believed we could reasonably explain how and why any accounts might show our client accessed or attempted to access the Petitioner’s accounts, but there was a problem. 

THE WALL:

Without spending thousands of dollars on a forensic expert, the only way to definitively prove anything was to subpoena one or more of the tech companies for the Petitioner’s electronic logs. We chose to issue a subpoena to Google for certain information related to the Petitioner’s accounts. The problem, however, was that because an Ex Parte Order of Protection had been granted against our client before he hired us, we had less than 14 days before the Order of Protection hearing. 

Google can legally decline to comply with a subpoena if the timeline for producing the data is less than 30 days, which ours was. Additionally, the Petitioner filed a Motion to Quash the subpoena. Because our client didn’t want the Ex Parte Order of Protection in place any longer than necessary, we decided to proceed with what we had and, if necessary, revisit the subpoena issue on the day of the hearing.

THE BREAKTHROUGH:

As we discussed these accounts with the lawyer for the Petitioner, it became more and more clear that the accounts she was accusing our client of “hacking” were in fact the business accounts for the business they ran together for eight years. Our client was the creator of the accounts and maintained access until his voluntary exit from the company about one year prior to this order of protection. Knowing this helped us narrow down exactly what electronic logs the Petitioner had that might indicate that our client tried to access them.

Without diving into the technical details, we were able to explain how the Petitioner’s evidence against our client was a series of natural and unavoidable outcomes due to “how” the accounts were initially set up. Furthermore, we were able to show how she could have, and likely did, trigger these outcomes without our client’s permission or prior knowledge. The subpoena we issued to Google would be all the definitive proof we needed.

Through her counsel, she eventually admitted all of this, and it became clear that her motive and goal was solely to maintain control of the business rather than actually being afraid of our client. Text messages between the two of them around the same time the alleged “hacking” occurred also showed this. 

THE OUTCOME/RESULT:

Without even having to have a hearing, we saved our client from any negative public attention whatsoever! On the threat of a counter suit, the Petitioner agreed to voluntarily dismiss the Order of Protection with prejudice and our client’s record was later expunged. At the end of the day, our client was completely vindicated and is free to exercise any rights he maintained in the company and participate in the community he helped create.

Case Summary

The Stakes: Our client had zero criminal history and was a high-profile individual.

The goal: To protect our client’s public profile and safeguard him from unnecessary risk, our goal was to have the order of protection dismissed and, if possible, expunged.

The charges:

 Ex Parte Order of Protection and Order of Protection.

Charge Classifications: Order of Protection

Relevant Laws for Charge:

T.C.A. § 36-3-602

Outcome Result: Without even having to have a hearing, our client was completely vindicated without any negative public attention. He is free to exercise any rights he maintained in the company and participate in the community he helped create.

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Helpful Resources
Nashville Attorneys
Most Viewed


…Cynthia Sherwood is my advocate, my lawyer, and my friend. She cares about me as a human being and gave her entire heart, mind, and soul to my case. When I was found innocent, I screamed and cried with such joy, thanking God that He led me to Cynthia Sherwood. She saved my life, and if you make the decision to hire her when you’re in a jam, she just might save yours too.
-Ken

Read More Reviews > ]

Need Legal Help?

Let us know how Sherwood Boutique Litigation can help you. For the fastest response, call (615) 873-5670 during business hours. If it’s after hours or you’d like us to call you, fill out our contact form or contact us via live chat. We’re located in the heart of downtown Nashville. Check the map below for directions.

The Communities We Serve

We serve all of the Nashville Metro area communities, which includes Davidson County and all the surrounding counties. However, we sometimes take larger criminal and/or civil cases, such as bank or investor fraud, that may involve litigating multiple states. Aside from the larger case exemption, the full list of TN communities we serve are listed below.

Davidson County
General Sessions Courthouse
Criminal Courthouse
More information

Dickson County
General Sessions Courthouse
Criminal Courthouse
More information

Cheatham County
General Sessions Courthouse
Criminal Courthouse
More information

Williamson County
General Sessions Courthouse
Criminal Courthouse
More information

Wilson County
General Sessions Courthouse
Criminal Courthouse
More information

Robertson County
General Sessions Courthouse
Criminal Courthouse
More information

Rutherford County
General Sessions Courthouse
Criminal Courthouse
More information

Sumner County
General Sessions Courthouse
Criminal Courthouse
More information

Middle District of Tennessee
Federal Courthouse
More information

Davidson County
General Sessions Courthouse
Criminal Courthouse
More information

Dickson County
General Sessions Courthouse
Criminal Courthouse
More information

Cheatham County
General Sessions Courthouse
Criminal Courthouse
More information

Williamson County
General Sessions Courthouse
Criminal Courthouse
More information

Wilson County
General Sessions Courthouse
Criminal Courthouse
More information

Robertson County
General Sessions Courthouse
Criminal Courthouse
More information

Rutherford County
General Sessions Courthouse
Criminal Courthouse
More information

Sumner County
General Sessions Courthouse
Criminal Courthouse
More information

Middle District of Tennessee
Federal Courthouse
More information